<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monopod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petertan.com/blog/2003/12/28/monopod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2003/12/28/monopod/</link>
	<description>Living One Day At A Time</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: prema</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>prema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>cool gift! I have the same problem with photos and with my cam it's especially difficult because the autofocus has a mind of its own. But how does the monopod work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool gift! I have the same problem with photos and with my cam it&#8217;s especially difficult because the autofocus has a mind of its own. But how does the monopod work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petertan</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>petertan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I have not really tested it yet. Basically one end is attached to the camera and the other anchored to the ground, very much like how you would a tripod. It does reduce camera shake significantly but does not eliminate it totally. It all depends on how well you use it to your advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not really tested it yet. Basically one end is attached to the camera and the other anchored to the ground, very much like how you would a tripod. It does reduce camera shake significantly but does not eliminate it totally. It all depends on how well you use it to your advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimi</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>kimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Peter,

Just curious, which brand &#038; model of monopod that Yuan gave you for christmas? I have the Manfrotto 682 monopod, kind heavy, but very useful for me to take pictures especially in motorsport shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>Just curious, which brand &#038; model of monopod that Yuan gave you for christmas? I have the Manfrotto 682 monopod, kind heavy, but very useful for me to take pictures especially in motorsport shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petertan</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>petertan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2003/12/28/monopod/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>It is an unbranded monopod. The Manfrotto that I liked was too bulky and heavy and made my little digicam looked out of place. I am using this monopod mostly for low light and night shots.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an unbranded monopod. The Manfrotto that I liked was too bulky and heavy and made my little digicam looked out of place. I am using this monopod mostly for low light and night shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
