<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fire, Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/05/09/fire-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/05/09/fire-again/</link>
	<description>Living One Day At A Time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2642</guid>
		<description>Peter, what about informing the press?  Would that be a solution? It seems that there is no movement neither after your letters, conversations, nor via the different blogs.  Shall we move the canons into a different location?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, what about informing the press?  Would that be a solution? It seems that there is no movement neither after your letters, conversations, nor via the different blogs.  Shall we move the canons into a different location?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: percolator</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2643</link>
		<dc:creator>percolator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2643</guid>
		<description>Yes, certainly the press. 

But first...seems to me, you have skipped (?), missed (?), neglected (?) the obvious - the influential. You know a couple of them. 

For instance, Screenshots - the icon of Malaysian blogosphere. 

I have been wondering why. 


p/s: please excuse my forthrightness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, certainly the press. </p>
<p>But first&#8230;seems to me, you have skipped (?), missed (?), neglected (?) the obvious - the influential. You know a couple of them. </p>
<p>For instance, Screenshots - the icon of Malaysian blogosphere. </p>
<p>I have been wondering why. </p>
<p>p/s: please excuse my forthrightness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkworm</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>bkworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>I feel so helpless just reading about it, what more for you who is directly affected!  I totally agree with Andreas and Percolator.  Surely there are bloggers out there who are members of the press.  This kind of thing ought to be published in the newspaper to get everyone's attention. Then maybe the person/s who is/are responsible will be 'cornered' to take action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel so helpless just reading about it, what more for you who is directly affected!  I totally agree with Andreas and Percolator.  Surely there are bloggers out there who are members of the press.  This kind of thing ought to be published in the newspaper to get everyone&#8217;s attention. Then maybe the person/s who is/are responsible will be &#8216;cornered&#8217; to take action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucia</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>well, mack had (and is still) bringing this issue up, and 'promoting' its cause. he's as good as jeff ooi, only he's not the most influential blogger. ok maybe mack can request jeff to made a mention of this issue in his blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, mack had (and is still) bringing this issue up, and &#8216;promoting&#8217; its cause. he&#8217;s as good as jeff ooi, only he&#8217;s not the most influential blogger. ok maybe mack can request jeff to made a mention of this issue in his blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2646</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2005/05/09/fire-again/#comment-2646</guid>
		<description>Andreas,
I am exploring that option. At the moment, I have not exhausted what I have planned to do yet.

percolator,
Perhaps Jeff have other more pressing matters to attend to.

bkworm,
In time, the press will be roped in. For the moment, I have several other options to consider.

lucia,
As I have told percolator and the rest, I have some options which I am exploring. Let me work on that first.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andreas,<br />
I am exploring that option. At the moment, I have not exhausted what I have planned to do yet.</p>
<p>percolator,<br />
Perhaps Jeff have other more pressing matters to attend to.</p>
<p>bkworm,<br />
In time, the press will be roped in. For the moment, I have several other options to consider.</p>
<p>lucia,<br />
As I have told percolator and the rest, I have some options which I am exploring. Let me work on that first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
