<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seditious Message On Personal Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/09/17/seditious-message-on-personal-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/09/17/seditious-message-on-personal-blog/</link>
	<description>Living One Day At A Time</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: spot</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/09/17/seditious-message-on-personal-blog/#comment-4029</link>
		<dc:creator>spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2005/09/17/seditious-message-on-personal-blog/#comment-4029</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

Just a suggestion. Since the boulder's been pushed off the cliff with the lodging of a report, you might want to delete the offensive comment? 

Because having it there is pretty much publishing it, and that's going to make you liable as well, if Good Man is successfully prosecuted (and sorry, I think reality is that he won't be). Especially when you've made it very clear that you yourself think it's seditious. 

The harm of having any reader drop in and read it (thereby succesfully propagating the dissemination of the seditious sentiment) is so very forseeable, but you continue to publish. You'd easily be pinned for recklessness at the very least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Just a suggestion. Since the boulder&#8217;s been pushed off the cliff with the lodging of a report, you might want to delete the offensive comment? </p>
<p>Because having it there is pretty much publishing it, and that&#8217;s going to make you liable as well, if Good Man is successfully prosecuted (and sorry, I think reality is that he won&#8217;t be). Especially when you&#8217;ve made it very clear that you yourself think it&#8217;s seditious. </p>
<p>The harm of having any reader drop in and read it (thereby succesfully propagating the dissemination of the seditious sentiment) is so very forseeable, but you continue to publish. You&#8217;d easily be pinned for recklessness at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spot</title>
		<link>http://www.petertan.com/blog/2005/09/17/seditious-message-on-personal-blog/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertan.com/blog/archives/2005/09/17/seditious-message-on-personal-blog/#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>hmm..when i wrote that comment, GM's was still on the original post. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm..when i wrote that comment, GM&#8217;s was still on the original post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
