Can Political Change Translate To New Hope For Disabled People?

Now we have four state governments in Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor that are not from the Barisan Nasional, apart from Kelantan that has been held by PAS for the last 18 years. What can the common people expect from this radical change that unexpectedly swept through the entire nation? What can disabled people expect from the Chief Minister of Penang, the Menteri Besars of Kedah, Perak and Selangor? What can disabled people expect from the local governments in terms of accessibility to the built environment and other services provided by these authorities?

In all sincerity, I fervently pray that disabled people will get a better deal from now on. Accessibility to the built environment still poses a major stumbling block to the mobility and independence of disabled people all over Malaysia. As much a we would like to become part of the community that we live in, many of us are still unable to get out from our homes safely because the surrounding areas are fraught with barriers and dangers.

These include walkways without functional ramps for wheelchair users and tactile indicators for the blind. In addition to that, street furniture such as lampposts, signboards and various utility boxes are indiscriminately positioned along the walkways. Some walkways have uncovered manholes. These not only obstruct the passage but poses potential risk of injury to disabled people but to non-disabled people as well.

Oftentimes, by building ramps and placing the wheelchair logo to the doors of toilets, these places are said to be accessible and “disabled-friendly.” This is a very misleading notion. I have encountered ramps that are too steep, too slippery, too long or do not have railings. Such ramps are not functional and are dangerous. I have fallen while using a few. A spacious toilet or one with the wheelchair logo does not necessarily make it suitable for wheelchair users. Grabs bars, toilet bowls, sinks, water hose and even the door itself must be of a certain height and feature for them to be functional

There are standards for such facilities. The Standards & Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia (SIRIM) has published the Malaysian Standard 1184 (MS 1184) and Malaysian Standard 1331 (MS 1331) specifically for this purpose. MS 1184 pertains to access for disabled persons to public buildings while MS 1331 is on access outside buildings. The code of practice for these two standards is often ignored. Builders are often left to do their own interpretation of such facilities. Interpretation of such facilities from the viewpoint of non-disabled persons or persons who have no understanding of disability most times render such facilities unusable.

The local governments such as the Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya (MBPJ) and Majlis Perbandaran Ampang Jaya (MPAJ) are responsible in ensuring that those standards are adhered to in public buildings and public amenities. Little has been done to by these authorities with regards to that. A cursory survey of the areas under these two authorities provides ample proof of that fact. My letters to the MPAJ President complaining of dangerous and inaccessible walkways never got a reply. This is another proof that problems of disabled people pertaining to accessibility in the built environment are often ignored and forgotten.

Therefore it is with great hope that with the change in political climate, issues faced by disabled people with regards to accessibility will be given more attention. The new state governments and local authorities have the means to resolve this matter if they are serious about it. One of the ways is to mainstream disability – to accept that disability is society’s problems rather than that of a minority of individuals. Disabled people must be involved in all levels of decision making on matters that affect them. I hope the new powers that be seriously take note of this. We have been ignored and marginalised for far too long. The current development has given us some glimmer of optimism. I hope I am right about this.

Peter Tan Objects To Sending The 2nd Malaysian Astronaut Into Space

As a citizen of Malaysia, I hereby object to the suggestion to send the second astronaut into space at the cost of US$30mil (RM102mil) as reported by The Star (Normal to pick space crew at the last minute, says JJ – Tuesday September 25, 2007).

“If Malaysians want him to be sent to space too, I will raise the matter up with the Cabinet. He is after all, ready and able.

He added that the cost of sending the second Malaysian astronaut was estimated to be US$30mil (RM102mil).

This amount can be better used to improve the lives of thousands, if not millions, of our fellow Malaysians. I speak from the viewpoint of a disabled person. This money can be utilised to make the environment and public transport accessible, and support people with severe disabilities who are practicing independent living. These include providing funds for personal assistants and other support services. RM102mil is a lot of money and it should be used judiciously to benefit the most number of people.

For starters, the people at RapidKL kept saying that they do not have the money to make the public transport system under their management accessible. This RM102mil can go a log way towards achieving that. I have spoken to the State Assemblyman for Teratai YB Yap Soo Sun who said that Majlis Perbandaran Ampang Jaya does not have the funds to upgrade the walkways in Pandan Perdana into accessible ones because of the shortage of funds. RM102mil can do wonders to make all the walkways accessible. These are two examples how the RM102mil can be better spent. Why look so far away into outer space when things that are right before our eyes still need a lot of money and work? Lets get the priorities right here.

Related entry:
Malaysian Going To Outer Space, Disabled Persons Still Stuck At Home

Second Complaint Letter To MPAJ Regarding Inaccessible Pandan Perdana

It is absolutely disappointing that Majlis Perbandaran Ampang Jaya (MPAJ) never responded to my complaint regarding the inaccessible and dangerous walkways around Pandan Perdana. This was despite a letter from the Jabatan Kerajaan Tempatan (Department of Local Government) urging them to respond to my letter of complaint.

To pursue the case further, I have sent a second letter of complaint to MPAJ and copied it to the Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Setiausaha Kerajaan Selangor (Cawangan Kerajaan Tempatan), Menteri Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan, Jabatan Kerajaan Tempatan, Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga n Masyarakat, Pengarah Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat, ADUN for Teratai and Presiden Persatuan Orang-Orang Cacat Anggota Malaysia. A while ago, I personally handed this letter to ADUN for Teratai YB Yap Soo Soon who has agreed to look into this matter.

Rujukan JKT: KPKT(02)(S)927/5 klt. 49(80)

18 April 2007

Yang Dipertua
Majlis Perbandaran Ampang Jaya
Menara MPAJ
Jalan Pandan Utama
55100 Pandan Indah
Kuala Lumpur

INACCESSIBLE, DAMAGED AND OBSTRUCTED WALKWAYS AT PANDAN PERDANA A DANGER TO WHEELCHAIR USERS AND PEDESTRIANS

Dengan hormatnya saya merujuk kepada surat aduan saya yang bertarikh 28 Mei 2006 dan surat dari Pengarah Jabatan Kerajaan Tempatan kepada Yang Dipertua Majlis Perbandaran Ampang Jaya yang bertarikh 27 Julai 2006.

2. Saya teramat kecewa dengan sikap MPAJ yang tidak mengendahkan aduan saya serta surat dari pihak Jabatan Kerajaan Tempatan mengenai perkara di atas. Sudah 10 bulan semenjak surat aduan tersebut tetapi MPAJ masih belum lagi memberi sebarang maklumbalas ataupun mengambil tindakan yang nyata.

3. Sebarang alas an yang akan diberi oleh pihak MPAJ atas kelekaannya tidak dapat diterima. Saya terpaksa menggunakan kerusi roda saya di atas jalan raya setiap kali saya hendak pergi ke kedai-kedai yang berdekatan sebab laluan pejalan kaki di Pandan Perdana tidak sesuai untuk digunakan oleh OKU. Sebahagian besar daripada laluan pejalan kaki sudah rosak dan terdapat tiang lampu yang didirikan di tengah-tengah laluan pejalan kaki (aduan surat saya yang bertarikh 28 Mei 206), menjadikan laluan itu terlalu sempit untuk kegunaan saya. Setiap kali saya menggunakan jalan raya dengan kerusi roda, saya berdoa agar tidak dilanggar oleh kenderaan di jalan raya yang sibuk itu.

4. Kenapa OKU mesti menggadai nyawa mereka setiap kali mereka hendak pergi ke mana-mana? Bukankah tanggungjawab MPAJ untuk menyediakan dan memperbaiki kemudahan-kemudahan awam dalam daerah kawalannya termasuk mewujudkan persekitaran yang mesra? Apakah gunanya Undang-Undang Kecil 34A Undang-Undang Kecil Bangunan Seragam 1986 yang telah diwartakan sekiranya MPAJ tidak bersungguh-sungguh untuk menguatkuasakannya?

5. Persekitaran yang mesra OKU bukan sahaja memanfaatkan golongan OKU. Malah persekitaran ini juga memanfaatkan warga emas, ibu mengandung dan mereka yang mengalami kesulitan pergerakan (mobility impairment). Pada amnya persekitaran mesra OKU adalah satu cara utama untuk memastikan golongan yang mempunyai kesulitan pergerakan tidak tersisir dari arus pembangunan negara dan menjaminkan mereka dapat turut serta dalam segala aktiviti masyarakat.

6. Saya berharap Tuan Yang Dipertua akan mengambil berat tentang aduan ini dan mengambil tindakan yang sepatutnya dengan secepat mungkin untuk mengelakkan perkara yang berlaku kepada saya dari berulang lagi atau mengelakkan kemalangan yang melibatkan kecederaan serius atau kehilangan nyawa dari berlaku. Perhatian Tuan dalam perkara ini amat dihargai dan didahului dengan ucapan terima kasih.

Sekian.